[detective] ‘you have the right to remain silent ..anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law ..you have the right to an attorney present during questioning ..if you cannot afford an attorney one will be appointed for you ..do you understand these rights?’
[suspect] ‘well shit detective ..how much thought have you given them?’
[detective] ‘looks like we got a wise guy here ..I’d advise you not to get to cute ..understand?’
[suspect] ..just get me my attorney and we’ll do lunch ..big guy’
[40 minutes later he is joined by his attorney and the interview proceeds]
[suspect] ‘mind if I take notes?’ [ writing something on the first page of his notepad]
[detective] ‘I’d like to ask you some questions regarding your activities last night’
[suspect] ‘I may respond to some of your questions’ [..in a concilliatory tone]
[detective] ‘look this is a slam dunk ..we’ve got you at the scene of the crime ..we got the murder weapon ..why’d ya do it?’
[suspect] ‘you’ve asked me a direct question ..naturally you’re expecting a response but if I remained silent it wouldn’t be very pretty ..this is the politicization of silence ..if I don’t respond instantly it is taken to be an admission of guilt as a lack of denial ..in fact it would be even worse if I actually denied it later ..a non-adjacent denial ..not the preferred response ..its a basic little rule of conversation analysis ..all conversations have been found to be made up of little rules ..it involves the concept of turns otherwise known as adjacency pair structures ..your initiation of it is called the first pair part ..my response or turn ..would be known as the second pair part ..your strategy seeks to turn an act of voluntary co-operation into involuntary compliance ..good luck with that’
[detective] ‘you’re a pretty sharp dude ..evading my questions ..seems suspicious ..got something to hide?’
[suspect] [writing something on the second page of his notepad] ‘well ..you are paid to be vexatious with you’re reasoning..arent you?..just like a lawyer [winking at his lawyer] ..in my case ..its all for free’ [smiling]
[detective] ‘we know you’ve been harassing his informants ‘
[suspect] ‘look ..if I asked you a question ..you’d only play ball insofar as your second pair part was only some kind of clarifying response ..otherwise ..you’d fail to offer an adjacent response ..now.. you’re misinterpreting something I did or said or didn’t say ..in fact you’ve been trained to ..the preferred response here is for me to ‘let it go’ ..yet if I wish to clarify it at any later stage not only does it look worse ..sorta like I’m changing my story..it also falls outside the framework of your rule-set ..meaning you’re likely to respond with a disjunctive shift’
[detective] ‘you think this is some kind of a game ..a fucking joke ..smartass?’
[suspect] [holding up the first note taken earlier ..it reads 'you think this is some kind of a joke?']
[detective] ‘you just don’t give a fuck do ya [leaning in close ..menacingly] ..listen professor ..I ain’t got time for this ..I got a dead undercover cop ..a family of seven that needs some answers ..and a bunch of cops out there ready to play hardball ..understand?’
[suspect] [holds up the second page ..it reads 'this is where you probably make some sort of sarcastic ad hominem ..possibly even insinuating a lack of basic humanity ..possibly even a thinly veiled threat' ..he screws up both pages into a tight little bundle and tosses them into the waste basket] ‘..you might want to get the fingerprints off that ..are we done here?’ [looking at his attorney]
[attorney] [on their way out] ‘you don’t like cops much ..do you?’ [a half smile]
[suspect] ‘I don’t have a problem with cops ..just some of their rule-sets’

